Developing Renewables in Romania: PUZ or Pass?
17 Octombrie 2022 Mihaela Nyerges, Partener - Vlăsceanu, Nyerges & Partners
The practice of the authorities seems to differ: there are local authorities that request a PUZ for the issuance of the building permit, and authorities that no longer impose such an obligation through the urban planning certificate.
| |
One of the most frequent questions asked there days by renewables investors and developers is whether PUZ is still required for developing small renewable power projects in Romania (below 50 ha). The relevance of this question is huge as the answer impacts on the duration of the development process with up to 9 months.
To answer, brief preliminary comments should be made regarding the general construction permitting rules, depending on the various types of lands.
1. Types of lands
The following lands qualifications are relevant for the current topic:
(i) from the perspective of their location, the lands can be (a) located intra-muros (within the buildable perimeter of the respective territorial administrative unit) or (b) located extra-muros (outside such perimeter);
(ii) from the perspective of their destination, the lands can be, among others, (a) agricultural lands or (b) yards-constructions lands;
(iii) from the perspective of their fertility class, the agricultural lands are split into 5 fertility classes, ranging from very fertile land (Class I) to very low fertile land (Class V); the fertility class is established based soil analysis made by experts within the county Office of Pedological Studies.
2. General construction rule
As a general rule, all constructions may be erected only on lands (i) located intra-muros and (ii) qualifying as “yards-constructions”.
If the targeted land qualifies as extra-muros and agricultural land (which is typically the case with the land suitable for renewable projects),
(i) the land should be first requalified from extra-muros into intra-muros land by means of a PUZ;
(ii) no additional formalities should be done for converting the land from agricultural land to “yards-construction” land, as such conversion occurs automatically through the issuance of the building permit.
3. Exception dedicated to renewable energy projects
Late July this year, an exception from the above rule was adopted, expressly allowing the construction of renewable power generation projects on extra-murros lands if the following conditions are met:
(i) land has fertility class III, IV and V; and
(ii) land does not exceed 50 ha.
Therefore, projects falling within the above limitations no longer need to obtain requalification of the land from extra-muros to intra-murros land through a PUZ.
4. Need of a PUZ in case of renewable projects below 50 ha
Therefore, do we still need or not a PUZ for developing renewable on land with fertility class III, IV and V which does not exceeds 50 ha?
The practice of the authorities seems to differ: there are local authorities that request a PUZ for the issuance of the building permit, and authorities that no longer impose such an obligation through the urban planning certificate. We have also encountered a case where the authority changed its mind after having issued an urban planning certificate whereby no PUZ was requested.
Nevertheless, it should be mentioned that PUZ has multiple roles, not just the introduction of land into intra-murros area, as explained below:
(i) according to the general construction law (with certain exceptions not applicable hereto), the building permit may be issued only if (a) there is an urban documentation approved regarding the respective land, setting out the legal, technical and economical regime of the land and (b) the envisaged construction is compatible with the rules set out by the respective urban documentation;
(ii) all communes and towns in Romania must have an urban documentation approved – namely a general urban plan (“PUG”) adopted by the local authorities setting out (a) the function of each land (such as residential, industrial etc.) and (b) the applicable urbanism parameters and limitations (such as land occupation percentage, land occupation coefficient, height regime, etc.);
(iii) PUG is a sufficient urbanism documentation for the issuance of a building permit if (a) it provides the legal, technical and economical regime of the targeted land and (b) the envisaged project is compatible with the regime set out thereby;
(iv) if (a) the PUG does not provide the legal, technical and economical regime of the targeted land or (b) the envisaged construction is not compatible with the rules set out by the PUG for the targeted land or (c) there is no PUG in place (for example, it was never approved, it expired, it was cancelled in court or suspended), the developer must obtain a zonal urban plan (“PUZ”) whereby to adopt/amend the urbanism rules so that they are compatible with the project;
(v) generally, PUGs do not regulate extra-muros land or do not establish an urbanism function/regime compatible with renewable projects;
(vi) very recently, a new exception from the need to adopt an urbanism documentation was added in case of other specific types of constructions allowed on extra murros land.
Further to the above, PUZs are still needed for developing renewable projects on lands below 50 ha in order to establish the function and urbanism parameters of the respective land that are compatible with the envisaged project. Nevertheless, a case-by-case assessment should be made regarding the PUG rules applicable on the respective land. Such assessment should be made by the consultants of the developer, without simply relying on the assessment made by the local authorities when issuing the urbanism certificate.
| Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() ![]() |
| Articol 994 / 4632 | Următorul articol |
| Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() |
2025, anul proiectelor „extrem de complexe” pentru Bohâlțeanu & Asociații, cu finanțări suverane și LMA de circa 2 miliarde euro, M&A de peste 1 miliard euro și restructurări complexe în Employment | De vorbă cu Ionuț Bohâlțeanu (Managing Partner) despre parcursul anului trecut și obiectivele din 2026
Câți avocați au firmele de top în evidențele Baroului București la începutul anului 2026 | Liderii nu se schimbă, dar își ajustează echipele. Top 20 rămâne stabil ca nume, dar se schimbă ca dinamică. Ce firme au înregistrat creșteri semnificative de ”headcount”, câte și-au micșorat efectivele și ce înseamnă asta
Client Choice by Lexology: Ioana Racoți (ZRVP), Adina Chilim Dumitriu (NNDKP), Octavian Adam (GNP), printre cei șapte profesioniști care se diferențiază prin calitatea relației cu clientul și capacitatea de a adăuga valoare reală afacerii acestuia | Cine sunt avocații români pentru care nominalizările au venit exclusiv de la corporate counsels, într-o procedură ce nu poate fi influențată și care sunt ariile de practică în care excelează
Kinstellar a asistat Foxway în achiziția firmei locale All Birotic Devices Trade & Service. Echipă pluridisciplinară, coordonată de Zsuzsa Csiki (Partner, Co-Head M&A ̸ Corporate) și Mihai Stan (Managing Associate)
Mușat & Asociații intră și în arbitrajul ICSID inițiat de Starcom Holding, acționarul principal al grupului Eurohold Bulgaria și va lupta, de partea statului român, cu Pinsent Masons (Londra), DGKV (Sofia) și CMS (București)
Peligrad Law a obținut anularea unor obligații fiscale de peste 6 mil. € pentru un șantier naval din România, o decizie de referință pentru practica fiscală
CMS asistă CCE cu privire la vânzarea proiectului fotovoltaic Horia 2 către Renalfa Solarpro Group. Echipa multidisciplinară a fost coordonată de Rodica Manea (Corporate M&A), cu sprijinul Variniei Radu (Head of Energy)
Țuca Zbârcea & Asociații a asistat Banca Transilvania în finanțarea celei mai mari instalații de stocare a energiei în baterii din România, dezvoltată de Nova Power & Gas
Kinstellar a stat alături de BIG Mega Renewable Energy în cadrul unei finanțări de peste 100 milioane EUR pentru Parcul Eolian Văcăreni. Echipa, condusă de Magdalena Răducanu (Partener) și Răzvan Constantinescu (Managing Associate)
Muşat & Asociaţii a obținut un succes de referință în materia taxelor impuse de Oficiul Național al Jocurilor de Noroc. Angela Porumb (Partner) a coordonat dosarul, implicate fiind departamentele de Litigii, Fiscal și Gaming & Gambling ale firmei
Filip & Company a asistat Global Vision Investment Fund în obținerea unei finanțări de 12,7 milioane de euro. Camelia Ianțuc (senior associate) în prim plan
Încă un spin-off în piața avocaturii | Partenerul Cristian Popescu și echipa sa de zece avocați au părăsit Dentons pentru a lansa o nouă fimă: “A fost o plecare voluntară, iar seniorii cu care lucram au devenit parteneri în noua entitate”. Popescu Roman Radu Florea își va crește echipa și activitatea în mai multe arii de practică până la sfârșitul anului
-
BizBanker
-
BizLeader
- in curand...
-
SeeNews
in curand...









RSS





