ZRP
Tuca Zbarcea & Asociatii

Developing Renewables in Romania: PUZ or Pass?

17 Octombrie 2022   |   Mihaela Nyerges, Partener - Vlăsceanu, Nyerges & Partners

The practice of the authorities seems to differ: there are local authorities that request a PUZ for the issuance of the building permit, and authorities that no longer impose such an obligation through the urban planning certificate.

 
 

One of the most frequent questions asked there days by renewables investors and developers is whether PUZ is still required for developing small renewable power projects in Romania (below 50 ha). The relevance of this question is huge as the answer impacts on the duration of the development process with up to 9 months.

To answer, brief preliminary comments should be made regarding the general construction permitting rules, depending on the various types of lands.

1.          Types of lands

The following lands qualifications are relevant for the current topic:

(i)         from the perspective of their location, the lands can be (a) located intra-muros (within the buildable perimeter of the respective territorial administrative unit) or (b) located extra-muros (outside such perimeter);

(ii)       from the perspective of their destination, the lands can be, among others, (a) agricultural lands or (b) yards-constructions lands;

(iii)      from the perspective of their fertility class, the agricultural lands are split into 5 fertility classes, ranging from very fertile land (Class I) to very low fertile land (Class V); the fertility class is established based soil analysis made by experts within the county Office of Pedological Studies.

2.          General construction rule

As a general rule, all constructions may be erected only on lands (i) located intra-muros and (ii) qualifying as “yards-constructions”.

If the targeted land qualifies as extra-muros and agricultural land (which is typically the case with the land suitable for renewable projects),

(i)         the land should be first requalified from extra-muros into intra-muros land by means of a PUZ;

(ii)       no additional formalities should be done for converting the land from agricultural land to “yards-construction” land, as such conversion occurs automatically through the issuance of the building permit.

3.          Exception dedicated to renewable energy projects

Late July this year, an exception from the above rule was adopted, expressly allowing the construction of renewable power generation projects on extra-murros lands if the following conditions are met:

(i)         land has fertility class III, IV and V; and

(ii)       land does not exceed 50 ha.

Therefore, projects falling within the above limitations no longer need to obtain requalification of the land from extra-muros to intra-murros land through a PUZ.

4.          Need of a PUZ in case of renewable projects below 50 ha

Therefore, do we still need or not a PUZ for developing renewable on land with fertility class III, IV and V which does not exceeds 50 ha?

The practice of the authorities seems to differ: there are local authorities that request a PUZ for the issuance of the building permit, and authorities that no longer impose such an obligation through the urban planning certificate. We have also encountered a case where the authority changed its mind after having issued an urban planning certificate whereby no PUZ was requested.

Nevertheless, it should be mentioned that PUZ has multiple roles, not just the introduction of land into intra-murros area, as explained below:

(i)            according to the general construction law (with certain exceptions not applicable hereto), the building permit may be issued only if (a) there is an urban documentation approved regarding the respective land, setting out the legal, technical and economical regime of the land and (b) the envisaged construction is compatible with the rules set out by the respective urban documentation;

(ii)          all communes and towns in Romania must have an urban documentation approved – namely a general urban plan (“PUG”) adopted by the local authorities setting out (a) the function of each land (such as residential, industrial etc.) and (b) the applicable urbanism parameters and limitations (such as land occupation percentage, land occupation coefficient, height regime, etc.);

(iii)        PUG is a sufficient urbanism documentation for the issuance of a building permit if (a) it provides the legal, technical and economical regime of the targeted land and (b) the envisaged project is compatible with the regime set out thereby;

(iv)        if (a) the PUG does not provide the legal, technical and economical regime of the targeted land or (b) the envisaged construction is not compatible with the rules set out by the PUG for the targeted land or (c) there is no PUG in place (for example, it was never approved, it expired, it was cancelled in court or suspended), the developer must obtain a zonal urban plan (“PUZ”) whereby to adopt/amend the urbanism rules so that they are compatible with the project;

(v)          generally, PUGs do not regulate extra-muros land or do not establish an urbanism function/regime compatible with renewable projects;

(vi)        very recently, a new exception from the need to adopt an urbanism documentation was added in case of other specific types of constructions allowed on extra murros land.

Further to the above, PUZs are still needed for developing renewable projects on lands below 50 ha in order to establish the function and urbanism parameters of the respective land that are compatible with the envisaged project. Nevertheless, a case-by-case assessment should be made regarding the PUG rules applicable on the respective land. Such assessment should be made by the consultants of the developer, without simply relying on the assessment made by the local authorities when issuing the urbanism certificate.

 
 

PNSA

 
 

ARTICOLE PE ACEEASI TEMA

ARTICOLE DE ACELASI AUTOR


 

Ascunde Reclama
 
 

POSTEAZA UN COMENTARIU


Nume *
Email (nu va fi publicat) *
Comentariu *
Cod de securitate*







* campuri obligatorii


Articol 1053 / 4691
 

Ascunde Reclama
BREAKING NEWS
ESENTIAL
BDAttorneys a asistat Strabag Group într-o achiziție strategică. Ștefan Mantea (Partner) și Alexandra Siminiceanu (Senior Managing Associate), în prim plan
Filip & Company a asistat grupul ceh Star Capital Finance la intrarea pe piața din România prin achiziția a două parcuri de retail NEST, într-o tranzacție de aproape 40 mil. €. Ioana Roman (partener) a coordonat echipa
RTPR, Bondoc & Asociații și KPMG au consiliat tranzacția prin care fondul regional de private equity Provectus Capital Partners a dobândit pachetul majoritar al companiei Seatbelt Consulting | Echipele implicate în proiect, coordonatorii și tipul de asistență oferită
De la conformarea GDPR, la o guvernanță complexă a datelor | Cum se văd aceste transformări din practica firmei Reff & Asociații | Deloitte Legal și care sunt cele mai importante schimbări observate în comportamentul clienților, într-o discuție cu Georgiana Singurel (Partener) și Silvia Axinescu (Counsel)
Reff & Asociații | Deloitte Legal lansează campania aniversară de 20 de ani, care include evenimente de business, formate inovatoare și conținut video divers
PNSA susține juridic Turneul Internațional Stradivarius
RADOX intră în parteneriat cu Solida Capital pentru un proiect rezidențial boutique în Capitală I Schoenherr a asistat compania românească cu o echipă coordonată de Mădălina Neagu. Ce avocați a avut compania de investiții
Validare regională a unei specializări cu relevanță tot mai mare | De vorbă cu Monica Stătescu, Of-Counsel Filip & Company, nominalizată pentru titlul de „TMT Next Generation Partner of the Year” la Legal 500 Central and Eastern Europe Awards 2026, despre felul în care M&A, piețele de capital, proprietatea intelectuală și tehnologia se intersectează în mandate cu arhitectură juridică tot mai densă și despre profilul clientului TMT, cu nevoi care depășesc granițele tradiționale ale ariilor de practică
Reff & Asociații | Deloitte Legal a asistat MAS Real Estate, unul dintre cei mai mari proprietari de centre comerciale din România, în procesul de vânzare a șase proprietăți de acest tip către AFI Europe. Valoarea tranzacției depășește 280 de milioane de euro
Urmează o perioadă de tranziție critică pentru piața achizițiilor publice din România, marcată de presiuni simultane din direcții multiple. Creșterea cheltuielilor de apărare va genera un volum semnificativ de proceduri complexe, cu specificități juridice pe care puțini practicieni le stăpânesc în detaliu | De vorbă cu Manuela Guia, coordonatoarea GNP Guia Naghi & Partners, despre noile zone de sofisticare juridică și câteva măsuri prin care ar putea crește transparența și viteza procedurilor fără a afecta calitatea evaluării
Bondoc și Asociații SCA a obținut anularea unei executări silite într-o cauză cu implicații juridice relevante. Ioana Katona (Partener) și Horea Ile (Associate), în prim plan
Un portofoliu de peste trei miliarde de euro și patru proiecte strategice conturează una dintre cele mai relevante expresii ale complexității din energia românească | De vorbă cu Oana Ijdelea, coordonatoarea Ijdelea & Asociații despre punctele de fricțiune în dezvoltarea proiectelor energetice, arhitectura juridică transformată într-un veritabil factor de competitivitate și echipa în care mai multe specializări juridice funcționează integrat
 
Citeste pe SeeNews Digital Network
  • BizBanker

  • BizLeader

      in curand...
  • SeeNews

    in curand...