ZRP
Tuca Zbarcea & Asociatii

Developing Renewables in Romania: PUZ or Pass?

17 Octombrie 2022   |   Mihaela Nyerges, Partener - Vlăsceanu, Nyerges & Partners

The practice of the authorities seems to differ: there are local authorities that request a PUZ for the issuance of the building permit, and authorities that no longer impose such an obligation through the urban planning certificate.

 
 

One of the most frequent questions asked there days by renewables investors and developers is whether PUZ is still required for developing small renewable power projects in Romania (below 50 ha). The relevance of this question is huge as the answer impacts on the duration of the development process with up to 9 months.

To answer, brief preliminary comments should be made regarding the general construction permitting rules, depending on the various types of lands.

1.          Types of lands

The following lands qualifications are relevant for the current topic:

(i)         from the perspective of their location, the lands can be (a) located intra-muros (within the buildable perimeter of the respective territorial administrative unit) or (b) located extra-muros (outside such perimeter);

(ii)       from the perspective of their destination, the lands can be, among others, (a) agricultural lands or (b) yards-constructions lands;

(iii)      from the perspective of their fertility class, the agricultural lands are split into 5 fertility classes, ranging from very fertile land (Class I) to very low fertile land (Class V); the fertility class is established based soil analysis made by experts within the county Office of Pedological Studies.

2.          General construction rule

As a general rule, all constructions may be erected only on lands (i) located intra-muros and (ii) qualifying as “yards-constructions”.

If the targeted land qualifies as extra-muros and agricultural land (which is typically the case with the land suitable for renewable projects),

(i)         the land should be first requalified from extra-muros into intra-muros land by means of a PUZ;

(ii)       no additional formalities should be done for converting the land from agricultural land to “yards-construction” land, as such conversion occurs automatically through the issuance of the building permit.

3.          Exception dedicated to renewable energy projects

Late July this year, an exception from the above rule was adopted, expressly allowing the construction of renewable power generation projects on extra-murros lands if the following conditions are met:

(i)         land has fertility class III, IV and V; and

(ii)       land does not exceed 50 ha.

Therefore, projects falling within the above limitations no longer need to obtain requalification of the land from extra-muros to intra-murros land through a PUZ.

4.          Need of a PUZ in case of renewable projects below 50 ha

Therefore, do we still need or not a PUZ for developing renewable on land with fertility class III, IV and V which does not exceeds 50 ha?

The practice of the authorities seems to differ: there are local authorities that request a PUZ for the issuance of the building permit, and authorities that no longer impose such an obligation through the urban planning certificate. We have also encountered a case where the authority changed its mind after having issued an urban planning certificate whereby no PUZ was requested.

Nevertheless, it should be mentioned that PUZ has multiple roles, not just the introduction of land into intra-murros area, as explained below:

(i)            according to the general construction law (with certain exceptions not applicable hereto), the building permit may be issued only if (a) there is an urban documentation approved regarding the respective land, setting out the legal, technical and economical regime of the land and (b) the envisaged construction is compatible with the rules set out by the respective urban documentation;

(ii)          all communes and towns in Romania must have an urban documentation approved – namely a general urban plan (“PUG”) adopted by the local authorities setting out (a) the function of each land (such as residential, industrial etc.) and (b) the applicable urbanism parameters and limitations (such as land occupation percentage, land occupation coefficient, height regime, etc.);

(iii)        PUG is a sufficient urbanism documentation for the issuance of a building permit if (a) it provides the legal, technical and economical regime of the targeted land and (b) the envisaged project is compatible with the regime set out thereby;

(iv)        if (a) the PUG does not provide the legal, technical and economical regime of the targeted land or (b) the envisaged construction is not compatible with the rules set out by the PUG for the targeted land or (c) there is no PUG in place (for example, it was never approved, it expired, it was cancelled in court or suspended), the developer must obtain a zonal urban plan (“PUZ”) whereby to adopt/amend the urbanism rules so that they are compatible with the project;

(v)          generally, PUGs do not regulate extra-muros land or do not establish an urbanism function/regime compatible with renewable projects;

(vi)        very recently, a new exception from the need to adopt an urbanism documentation was added in case of other specific types of constructions allowed on extra murros land.

Further to the above, PUZs are still needed for developing renewable projects on lands below 50 ha in order to establish the function and urbanism parameters of the respective land that are compatible with the envisaged project. Nevertheless, a case-by-case assessment should be made regarding the PUG rules applicable on the respective land. Such assessment should be made by the consultants of the developer, without simply relying on the assessment made by the local authorities when issuing the urbanism certificate.

 
 

PNSA

 
 

ARTICOLE PE ACEEASI TEMA

ARTICOLE DE ACELASI AUTOR


 

Ascunde Reclama
 
 

POSTEAZA UN COMENTARIU


Nume *
Email (nu va fi publicat) *
Comentariu *
Cod de securitate*







* campuri obligatorii


Articol 1075 / 4713
 

Ascunde Reclama
BREAKING NEWS
ESENTIAL
NNDKP a asistat Globant în fuziunea prin care Pentalog Romania a absorbit Globant IT Romania. Echipa a fost coordonată de partenerul Răzvan Vlad
Wolf Theiss a asistat fondatorii Electroechipament Industrial Group în legătură cu vânzarea către Adrem
Țuca Zbârcea & Asociații și Schoenherr, alături de BCR și Electrocentrale Borzești în finanțarea de 47 mil. € a parcului eolian Gura Văii. Echipele au fost coordonate de Gabriela Anton și Adina Damaschin
LegiTeam: CMS CAMERON MCKENNA NABARRO OLSWANG LLP SCP is looking for: Associate | Corporate and M&A (2-4 years definitive ̸ qualified lawyer)
Filip & Company a asistat sindicatul bancar în finanțarea de 187 milioane de euro obținute de MOOV Leasing. Ce consultanți au mai lucrat în proiect
Lexology Index: Energy 2026 | Cine sunt avocații români care conduc practica de Energie: NNDKP impune tonul, ZRVP, Țuca Zbârcea, CMS, Kinstellar și alte două firme completează harta excelenței, de la Oil & Gas la regenerabile
Mușat & Asociații a asistat Leviatan Design și Ubitech Construcții în adjudecarea și apărarea cu succes a proiectului noului terminal al Aeroportului Henri Coandă
NestPlus semnează cu Exim Banca Românească o finanțare de 10 milioane de euro pentru Brăila Plaza, primul street mall din Brăila
ZRVP obține pentru Electromontaj o victorie definitivă într-un litigiu privind hotărârile AGA. Curtea de Apel București stabilește repere importante în materia dreptului societar | Alina Tugearu (partener) a coordonat echipa de avocați
Deloitte România si Reff & Asociații au asistat Banca de Investiții și Dezvoltare în evaluarea realizată de Comisia Europeană, care îi permite României instituirea unui mecanism alternativ de finanțare a domeniilor strategice
Investitori din energia solară cer în SUA executarea hotărârii ICSID împotriva României. Despăgubirile de 42,2 milioane de euro au ajuns, potrivit reclamanților, la peste 52 de milioane de euro, iar dobânda de cca. 9.500 de euro ̸ zi continuă să curgă | România nu are încă o echipă de avocați care să lupte cu King & Spalding, consultanții părții adverse. Comisia Europeană a deschis o investigație aprofundată
LSEG Legal Advisers | Piața globală de M&A a traversat primul semestru din 2026 la un maxim istoric, dar cu mai puține tranzacții. Europa revine puternic, iar firmele cu amprentă în România rămân vizibile în topurile globale și regionale
 
Citeste pe SeeNews Digital Network
  • BizLeader

      in curand...
  • SeeNews

    in curand...