Developing Renewables in Romania: PUZ or Pass?
17 Octombrie 2022 Mihaela Nyerges, Partener - Vlăsceanu, Nyerges & Partners
The practice of the authorities seems to differ: there are local authorities that request a PUZ for the issuance of the building permit, and authorities that no longer impose such an obligation through the urban planning certificate.
| |
One of the most frequent questions asked there days by renewables investors and developers is whether PUZ is still required for developing small renewable power projects in Romania (below 50 ha). The relevance of this question is huge as the answer impacts on the duration of the development process with up to 9 months.
To answer, brief preliminary comments should be made regarding the general construction permitting rules, depending on the various types of lands.
1. Types of lands
The following lands qualifications are relevant for the current topic:
(i) from the perspective of their location, the lands can be (a) located intra-muros (within the buildable perimeter of the respective territorial administrative unit) or (b) located extra-muros (outside such perimeter);
(ii) from the perspective of their destination, the lands can be, among others, (a) agricultural lands or (b) yards-constructions lands;
(iii) from the perspective of their fertility class, the agricultural lands are split into 5 fertility classes, ranging from very fertile land (Class I) to very low fertile land (Class V); the fertility class is established based soil analysis made by experts within the county Office of Pedological Studies.
2. General construction rule
As a general rule, all constructions may be erected only on lands (i) located intra-muros and (ii) qualifying as “yards-constructions”.
If the targeted land qualifies as extra-muros and agricultural land (which is typically the case with the land suitable for renewable projects),
(i) the land should be first requalified from extra-muros into intra-muros land by means of a PUZ;
(ii) no additional formalities should be done for converting the land from agricultural land to “yards-construction” land, as such conversion occurs automatically through the issuance of the building permit.
3. Exception dedicated to renewable energy projects
Late July this year, an exception from the above rule was adopted, expressly allowing the construction of renewable power generation projects on extra-murros lands if the following conditions are met:
(i) land has fertility class III, IV and V; and
(ii) land does not exceed 50 ha.
Therefore, projects falling within the above limitations no longer need to obtain requalification of the land from extra-muros to intra-murros land through a PUZ.
4. Need of a PUZ in case of renewable projects below 50 ha
Therefore, do we still need or not a PUZ for developing renewable on land with fertility class III, IV and V which does not exceeds 50 ha?
The practice of the authorities seems to differ: there are local authorities that request a PUZ for the issuance of the building permit, and authorities that no longer impose such an obligation through the urban planning certificate. We have also encountered a case where the authority changed its mind after having issued an urban planning certificate whereby no PUZ was requested.
Nevertheless, it should be mentioned that PUZ has multiple roles, not just the introduction of land into intra-murros area, as explained below:
(i) according to the general construction law (with certain exceptions not applicable hereto), the building permit may be issued only if (a) there is an urban documentation approved regarding the respective land, setting out the legal, technical and economical regime of the land and (b) the envisaged construction is compatible with the rules set out by the respective urban documentation;
(ii) all communes and towns in Romania must have an urban documentation approved – namely a general urban plan (“PUG”) adopted by the local authorities setting out (a) the function of each land (such as residential, industrial etc.) and (b) the applicable urbanism parameters and limitations (such as land occupation percentage, land occupation coefficient, height regime, etc.);
(iii) PUG is a sufficient urbanism documentation for the issuance of a building permit if (a) it provides the legal, technical and economical regime of the targeted land and (b) the envisaged project is compatible with the regime set out thereby;
(iv) if (a) the PUG does not provide the legal, technical and economical regime of the targeted land or (b) the envisaged construction is not compatible with the rules set out by the PUG for the targeted land or (c) there is no PUG in place (for example, it was never approved, it expired, it was cancelled in court or suspended), the developer must obtain a zonal urban plan (“PUZ”) whereby to adopt/amend the urbanism rules so that they are compatible with the project;
(v) generally, PUGs do not regulate extra-muros land or do not establish an urbanism function/regime compatible with renewable projects;
(vi) very recently, a new exception from the need to adopt an urbanism documentation was added in case of other specific types of constructions allowed on extra murros land.
Further to the above, PUZs are still needed for developing renewable projects on lands below 50 ha in order to establish the function and urbanism parameters of the respective land that are compatible with the envisaged project. Nevertheless, a case-by-case assessment should be made regarding the PUG rules applicable on the respective land. Such assessment should be made by the consultants of the developer, without simply relying on the assessment made by the local authorities when issuing the urbanism certificate.
| Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() ![]() |
| Articol 1023 / 4661 | Următorul articol |
| Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() |
LMG Life Sciences EMEA Awards 2026 | Cinci firme sunt în cursa pentru ”Romania Firm of the Year”, o casă de avocatură locală intră în bătălia paneuropeană din White Collar Crime și un singur avocat român este nominalizat individual. Lista scurtă, pe care sunt și NNDKP și Popescu & Asociații, arată o piață în care casele independente locale continuă să conteze, dar concurează cu rețele regionale la fel de capabile să capteze mandate sofisticate în sectorul Life Sciences
LegiTeam - Oportunitate de carieră | Avocat definitiv – Achiziții publice & Infrastructură
Achiziții Publice | Cristina IVAN, Managing Partner Ivan şi Asociaţii: Arhitectura colectivă a ofertei - Cine ofertează, ce se evaluează, cui i se atribuie şi cine, în realitate, execută
Inflația la control | Instanța confirmă: Fiscul datorează și actualizarea cu inflația, nu doar dobânda fiscală. Soluție obținută de Băncilă, Diaconu și Asociații, cu o echipă coordonată de Emanuel Băncilă (Partener)
Dispute-Resolution.Center: România în Legal 500 EMEA (2026) – White-collar crime | O practică cu mai multe centre de putere: firmele cu activitate intensă, avocații care dau greutate practicii și dosarele care au contat în evaluare
In-houseLegal: Loredana Coraș, Country Legal Counsel la PKO Bank Polski România, distinsă cu premiul Compliance Innovator la Lexology European Awards 2026 | ”Următoarea etapă a inovației în compliance și în activitatea juridică va fi definită de capacitatea de a integra tehnologia într-un mod responsabil, fără a pierde din vedere rolul acestei funcții, acela de a proteja banca”, spune unul dintre cei mai vizibili avocați interni din Europa
Analiza de ansamblu Legal 500 EMEA - 2026: lideri, arii fanion și avocații care contează
PNSA obține o soluție definitivă favorabilă la ÎCCJ într-un litigiu complex întemeiat pe îmbogățire fără justă cauză. Echipa, coordonată de Camelia Pătrașcu (Partener), cu implicarea, în diferite faze procedurale, a unei echipe extinse
Concurenta.ro | Chambers Europe 2026 - Cine domină practica de Competition ̸ Antitrust: Liderii își apără pozițiile, dar presiunea venită din eșalonul secund și din zona firmelor de nișă devine tot mai vizibilă
Achiziții-Publice.ro | România în ariile Projects și Projects & Energy din Chambers Europe 2026: NNDKP este liderul prezenței în vârful ierarhiei, iar Țuca Zbârcea & Asociații are o vizibilitate transversală foarte puternică. Filip & Company are una dintre cele mai bune formule de senioritate, iar CMS beneficiază pe profilul foarte puternic al Variniei Radu
Dispute-Resolution.Center: Cei mai buni litigatori din România, văzuți de Chambers Europe 2026 | Cine sunt practicienii apreciați de clienți în practica de Dispute Resolution și ce spun clienții despre aceștia. 11 avocați români sunt evidențiați în practica de arbitraj
Filip & Company anunță promovările anuale: Rebecca Marina devine partener, opt counsels și șase senior associates fac un pas înainte în carieră | Cristina Filip, co-managing partner Filip & Company: ”O recunoaștere a performanței individuale deosebite a colegilor noștri, dar și o dovadă că echipa susține creșterea noilor generații de lideri”
-
BizBanker
-
BizLeader
- in curand...
-
SeeNews
in curand...









RSS





